|
Written
by Juliet Bourke from Aequus Partners, Guest Contributor,
2008.
|
There
has never been a better time to implement workplace
flexibility. In this economic climate, flexibility
(e.g. reduced hours, sabbaticals and working from
home) offers a smart way to reduce overheads and
meet employee needs for great work-life balance.
Research also shows that implementing flexibility
will help improve productivity through its association
with increased levels of engagement, job-satisfaction
and well-being.
But
how can these theoretical benefits be realised?
Is it simply a matter of developing a flexible
work practices policy? To answer these questions,
the usual starting point would be to canvass the
views of employers and employees. A fresh perspective
has been provided by the Equal Employment Opportunity
Network of Australasia (EEONA) through its research
of Human Resource/diversity practitioners in best
practice organisations.
|
|
Launched
in July 2008, EEONA's 2008 Status report1
on diversity and flexibility found that (i) building
managerial capability to implement flexibility, and
(ii) enabling managers to access flexibility, are the
two key strategies to bridging the flexibility policy/practice
gap. What exactly does that mean for businesses wanting
to invest in developing organisational and managerial
capability? This note provides a summary of EEONA's
key findings, which were based on the survey responses
of 48 HR/diversity practitioners representing nearly
one quarter of a million employees (238,580) in best
practice organisations.
To
find out how you compare, take
the Workplace flexibility health check.
The
level (policy) playing field
For best practice organisations, having a flexibility
policy (which provides a statement of commitment to flexibility)
and offering a range of flexible work practices is a given.
As an example, the 48 companies surveyed claimed that
they offered the following:
| |
i. |
part-time
work (100%); |
| |
ii. |
flexible
start and finish times (89%); |
| |
iii. |
time-in-lieu
(88%); |
| |
iv. |
job-share
arrangements (81%); |
| |
v. |
tele-working
(75%); |
| |
vi. |
career-breaks
(72%); |
| |
vii. |
flexi-time
(72%). |
Was
that enough to create a flexible work environment? Unfortunately
not. Notwithstanding their flexibility policies and
broad offerings the majority of respondents (81%) rated
the effectiveness of their policies as average, or below
average, and this means that the value of these policies
is not being fully realised in terms of bottom line
benefits. Why? Recent research Aequus Partners conducted
in IAG found that workplace flexibility will improve
organisational and personal outcomes only if it is implemented
effectively.
The
gap between flexibility policy and practice
The EEONA research found, positively, that the majority
of respondents promote and encourage flexibility (71%),
and that approximately two-thirds of managers are strongly
supportive of flexibility and committed to implementation.
These findings suggest that the hearts of best practice
organisations are in the right place, and the development
of a flexibility policy is not part of a smokescreen
or veneer, but evinces a commitment to creating a "family
friendly" workplace in times of economic growth
and crisis.
The
issue is not with the heart - it is with the hands.
EEONA's research shows that the practical implementation
of flexibility is inconsistent (only 28% of respondents
agreed that flexibility is implemented consistently
across their organisation) and that managers struggle
with implementation (only 35% of respondents agreed
that managers have sufficient confidence to manage difficult
implementation issues). Identifying the problem is one
thing, but what is the change strategy that will resolve
the implementation gap?
Bridging
the implementation gap
In order to gain a deeper level of insight into the
strategies to help bridge the flexibility policy/practice
implementation gap, EEONA compared the responses of
high performing organisations (in terms of flexibility),
with low performing organisations (based on the organisation's
own self assessment). In this way, EEONA was able to
distinguish five strategies, from a broad range of initiatives
that are critical to effectively implementing flexibility:
| |
a. |
Talking
the talk: managers need to show a high level
of commitment to flexibility, and strongly support
flexible work practices. |
| |
b. |
Walking
the talk: managers must be effective role models
for flexibility. |
| |
c. |
Flexibility
for everyone: organisations must provide strong
support for managers using flexible work options,
not just staff. |
| |
d. |
A
great knowledge base: managers must have sufficient
knowledge about how to manage flexible work options.
|
| |
e. |
Practical
skills: managers must have sufficient confidence
to manage difficult implementation issues. |
In
summary, the results demonstrated the importance of
building managerial capability to manage a flexible
workforce. To a degree this should come as no surprise
as managers are the gatekeepers of flexibility for staff.
Rather, the benefit of the research is identifying that
the key aspects of this training are enhancing (i) knowledge;
(ii) confidence; and (iii) skills.
Conclusion
Apart from confirming the gap between flexibility policy
and practice, EEONA concluded: "the gap between
flexibility policy and practice is less about 'in-principle'
support for flexibility and more about perceived gaps
in managerial capabilities, managerial confidence and
role modelling in relation to flexibility, and consistency
of implementation". In addition, the research highlighted
the importance of job redesign to enable managers, as
well as staff, to work flexibily. In summary, workplace
flexibility offers a smart way for employers to address
the downturn in the economy, and a focus on managerial
training (both knowledge and skill-based) and job redesign
are the critical investment points to generate that
outcome.
Juliet Bourke is a partner at Aequus Partners which
recently launched www.workplaceflexibility.com.au,
a free information website on workplace flexibility.
References:
1. Re EEONA: http://www.eeona.org/ADES_2008_Report_25_July_2008.pdf
Back
to top
|